I’ve always said that peace cannot exist without justice. Peace without justice is anarchy. It is justice that allows peace to prosper. Without justice, those who wish to do harm can do so without regard to its consequences. Furthermore, justice provides the people with knowing that actions against them will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The Attorney General of the United States recently dropped all charges against the Black Panthers for voter intimidation. YouTube has a few videos of the voter intimidation. Justice Department did not release an official statement but simply dropped the charges. Most charges are dropped when there is not enough evidence to move forward with a trial, but with the video evidence, it seems like this is not the case.
continue reading »
|
Posted by
mike |
Categories:
Editorial | Tagged:
doj,
election 2008,
justice,
obama,
racism |
All over America, concerned citizens are showing up at Town Hall meetings and showing their disapproval of their elected lawmakers. Many of them are switching venues so they can hide behind “human shields” to avoid these citizens. Nancy Pelosi even pulled the “Nazi Card” by claiming she saw “swastikas” at these Town Hall meetings.
The White House wants people to report “disinformation” to flag@whitehouse.com. Barack Obama has even said he doesn’t want people who disagree with him to “do a whole lot of talking“.
This is nothing short of a desperate “President” trying to scare his critics into backing down. But, hey, if he wants to get a whole bunch of e-mails, that’s his business. I think We the People should report our neighbors for spreading disinformation. And I say we start with the Obama supporters.
No doubt that this community activist has enlisted a large army of kool-aid drinkers into doing his bidding. To level the playing field, we should do the same. In the next week, I’ll be debuting a website where fellow conservatives can report Obama supporters. Upload pictures of their bumper stickers (including license plates). Use the Freedom of Information Act in your state to obtain their address, phone number, and any other identifying information. That information will be publicly displayed for people to see.
Unlike the White House, this list will not be illegal since the information is publicly available. What people decide to do with the information is not up for the state to decide.
Once I have the website up and running, I’ll make another announcement on this site and on Twitter.
The World Net Daily reported Tuesday that a citizen grand jury issued an indictment against Obama. The charges are fraud and to, one and for all, prove that Obama has a legitimate claim to the presidency.
While I am not one of the people who believe Obama is not a citizen, the fact that so many people have blindly accepted this fact has caused me great concern. Several law suits have already been issued and quickly dismissed. However, there has been little to no information from the Obama camp to assuage these charges. Their silence has only deepened the controversy to the point that I am beginning to wonder why the president refuses to acknowledge this question.
Senators have taken the issue from their constituents and pretty much replied, “Whatever. Get a life.” But I found this particular reply interesting:
Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla.: “Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice – first in the primary elections and again in the general election. President-Elect Obama won the Democratic Party’s nomination after one of the most fiercely contested presidential primaries in American history. And, he has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States. Throughout both the primary and general election, concerns about Mr. Obama’s birthplace were raised. The voters have made clear their view that Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of president.”
Just because someone is elected by the people doesn’t mean that the elected is qualified as per the constitution. For example, we can vote for my dog by a huge majority. Yes, he can win the primary. And sure, he can win the general election. But it doesn’t mean that he can be president. I hope Senator Martinez isn’t suggesting that we completely ignore the constitution and only rely upon public opinion.
The problem I see with this whole issue is that the government as a whole thus far has suppressed these complaints. This is something that should be put to rest, once and for all. The court should rule that either Obama is duly qualified natural born citizen that can take the office of the President or that he isn’t.
The controversy has become incredibly strong. It needs to be put to rest.
The Washington Post and News 8 are running a story that speculates that the Obama administration will move Gitmo detainees to the Alexandria, VA. The Mayor of Alexandria, William D. Euille (D), had this to say:
We would be absolutely opposed to relocating Guantanamo prisoners to Alexandria. We would do everything in our power to lobby the president, the governor, the Congress and everyone else to stop it. We’ve had this experience, and it was unpleasant. Let someone else have it.
Mayor Euille, you are the worst kind of hypocrite. People have protested Gitmo and wanted it closed during the Bush administration. Now that some of those “innocent” people are going to be released, they don’t want them there!
This is similar to a story that I heard about a year ago. Montgomery county in Maryland said that they would not help Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdown on laborers. But the largely liberal community cried out when these laborers started loitering around their neighborhood.
This goes to show that liberals only care about justice when it’s cool and hip. If you truly believe that these wrongly held citizens are innocent, why not invite them with open arms?
I’ll be the first to say welcome! Here’s my letter to Major Euille:
Mayor Euille:
I am shocked by the comments you made regarding the possible relocation of Guantanamo detainees to Alexandria. Many of your constituents have demanded their release from the prison. Many of these same constituents wanted to end the war in Iraq. I personally don’t take these positions but I find it highly hypocritical that you would not welcome these detainees with open arms.
Per our constitution, all of these detainees are INNOCENT until proven guilty. With the new president, he is listening to the people and is releasing them. It’s not right for these same people to now complain when they are being released into their back yard. Alexandria, who voted President Obama in with a sweeping majority, should now embrace these detainees. After all, they haven’t even been charged with a crime.
I expect more from a leader such as yourself.
Sincerely,
Michael Soh
UPDATE :: 31 March 2009 10:00 am
Mayor Euille did me the courtous thing and replied to me. But it confuses more than it answers. I guess if he couldn’t do that he wouldn’t be in politics:
Dear Mr. Soh:
Thank you for your email. I appreciate your taking the time to let me know your concerns about the disposition of the Guantanamo detainees. While I support the closing of this facility and giving the detainees a fair trial, I believe that Alexandria has already done its fair share by handling for more than four years the Missaoui trial.
William D. Euille
Mayor
For those that don’t know, Missaoui, a Gitmo detainee was tried in the federal court located in Alexandria. Of course, there were protests and the like. The security alone cost an arm and a leg. However, a democratic society has the duty to administer justice, right? Well, apparently, Mayor Euille doesn’t believe in justice. He believes in convienence. Here is my reply to him:
Mayor Euille
I appreciate your reply. However, I’m confused by your last sentence of your e-mail. If you support giving the detainees a fair trail, why should it matter how many detainees are tried? Does this mean that you don’t support exonerating wrongly convicted prisoners?
It seems that there is a double standard. I believe that as a democracy, we should give these detainees the benefit of the doubt and support them as a community. They have yet to be proven of any wrong doing. I think that by saying that “Alexandria has done it’s fair share” you are saying “Let someone else deal with the problem.” But what problem is that? Administering justice? Making sure that a possibly innocent person gets his fair day in court?
The detainees should be treated with respect, and not like garbage that we can simply pass on to someone else. The next city many not be as accommodating as the fair citizens of Alexandria, who support President Obama. I continue to disagree with your position would appreciate a more thorough explanation.
Very respectfully,
Michael Soh