<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mikesoh.com &#187; racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikesoh.com/tag/racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikesoh.com</link>
	<description>conservative thoughts on a liberal world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US Department of Justice to change iconic motto on Supreme Court steps to “Equal Justice Under Law (As Politics Will Allow)”</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesoh.com/2010/07/us-department-of-justice-to-change-iconic-motto-on-supreme-court-steps-to-%e2%80%9cequal-justice-under-law-as-politics-will-allow%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikesoh.com/2010/07/us-department-of-justice-to-change-iconic-motto-on-supreme-court-steps-to-%e2%80%9cequal-justice-under-law-as-politics-will-allow%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesoh.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve always said that peace cannot exist without justice.  Peace without justice is anarchy.  It is justice that allows peace to prosper.  Without justice, those who wish to do harm can do so without regard to its consequences.  Furthermore, justice provides the people with knowing that actions against them will be prosecuted to the fullest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve always said that peace cannot exist without justice.  Peace without justice is anarchy.  It is justice that allows peace to prosper.  Without justice, those who wish to do harm can do so without regard to its consequences.  Furthermore, justice provides the people with knowing that actions against them will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.</p>
<p>The Attorney General of the United States <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/14/AR2010071405880.html">recently dropped all charges</a> against the Black Panthers for voter intimidation.  YouTube has a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=black+panther+voter+intimidation&amp;aq=7">few</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU">videos</a> of the voter intimidation.  Justice Department did not release an official statement but simply dropped the charges.  Most charges are dropped when there is not enough evidence to move forward with a trial, but with the video evidence, it seems like this is not the case.</p>
<p><span id="more-492"></span>The most disturbing aspect about this is the lack of communication from the White House or the Justice Department.  During the Bush administration, Justice Department officials cited plenty of evidence to move forward.  It is Obama’s Justice Department who has decided that there was “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/14/AR2010071405880.html">insufficient evidence</a>.”</p>
<p>The facts of the case are that two Black Panthers, both wearing camouflage fatigues and one carrying a night stick, were walking in front of the entrance of a voting place.  While the reports differ, the common denominator was that people felt frightened at the sight of the man.  The eye-witness reports range from outright barring of white people to simply “looking mean.”  Since the Justice Department has not released their investigation notes, it’s hard to say.</p>
<p>When the Justice Department dropped the charges, they have given permission for other groups to “look mean” at the polls.  Members of the KKK, in their robes, can stand outside polling places.  They don’t have to say anything.  They can even hold the door open for people.  If this is ALL that they do, they should not get charged.  Under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution">Fourteenth Amendment</a>, any “intimidation” that does not go beyond that of “looking mean” should be dismissed.  The sad fact may be that because the Obama administration is so adamant about flouting the Constitution and the law, Tea Partiers may end up being arrested and charged for simply wearing Anti-Obama shirts when they go to vote.</p>
<p>Of Obama wants to be the <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/77897-obama-says-he-would-rather-be-really-good-one-term-president">great president he says</a>, he should fire Eric Holder and conduct a special investigation into this case.  A dismissed charged does not attach jeopardy so the Black Panthers can be charged again.  Make the investigation transparent, open to the public, and independent.  Then again, the last time there was a special independent investigator, <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Whats-behind-Obamas-sudden-firing-of-the-AmeriCorps-inspector-general-47877797.html">he was fired</a> for finding fraudulent activity between Obama and a supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikesoh.com/2010/07/us-department-of-justice-to-change-iconic-motto-on-supreme-court-steps-to-%e2%80%9cequal-justice-under-law-as-politics-will-allow%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8: Why it&#8217;s the correct decision</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/05/prop-8-why-its-the-correct-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/05/prop-8-why-its-the-correct-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesoh.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawsuit brought against CA when voters approved a constitutional amendment should have been thrown out on it&#8217;s merits.  But the court took it the case and finally ruled on it today.  (Full opinion) Despite what you&#8217;ll hear from either the libs or the conservatives, the case is about the constitutional right of the people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawsuit brought against CA when voters approved a constitutional amendment should have been thrown out on it&#8217;s merits.  But the court took it the case and <a title="foxnews.com" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/26/california-high-court-rule-gay-marriage/" target="_blank">finally ruled on it today</a>.  (<a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S168047.PDF" target="_blank">Full opinion</a>)</p>
<p>Despite what you&#8217;ll hear from either the libs or the conservatives, the case is about the constitutional right of the people amending their own constitution.  It was <strong>not</strong> about gay marriage.</p>
<p>The court decision to <strong>uphold </strong>the initiative is the correct one.  The court, ruling 6-1, said:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a sense, petitioners&#8217; and the attorney general&#8217;s complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California Constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it.</p></blockquote>
<p>This brings integrety to the constitution.  It means that any measure approved by the people would be amended as voted.</p>
<p>Consider the opposite: let&#8217;s say that the court ruled that the constition cannot be ammended by the people.  Prop 8 is void.  So what if the LGBT community wanted to pass an amendment saying that marriage is for anyone and everyone?  Because the court ruled that amendments by the people must first be approved by the court, people can say that amendment isn&#8217;t really the will of the people, fosters racism, insensitivity, etc.</p>
<p>This was a good decision not because it protects marriage, but because it protects the constitution of California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/05/prop-8-why-its-the-correct-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racist America</title>
		<link>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/01/racist-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/01/racist-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikesoh.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First a disclaimer: This is probably going to be one of the most controversial posts I&#8217;ve written.  I say this for several reasons: First, I don&#8217;t think America is ready to hear it.  Second, I will be reflecting on the state of society.  Third, I will be talking about a minority group who has historically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>First a disclaimer: This is probably going to be one of the most controversial posts I&#8217;ve written.  I say this for several reasons: First, I don&#8217;t think America is ready to hear it.  Second, I will be reflecting on the state of society.  Third, I will be talking about a minority group who has historically been singled out for simply having a different skin color than what was considered normal.  Please understand that the thoughts and ideas addressed here should be considered as a whole.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s closing onto two weeks since Obama was christened as the new President.  Before he was sworn in, <a href="http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/01/questionable-motives-for-obama-inauguration/">I wrote</a> how Obama would first be judged as a black president before he would be judged as a president.  I stand by this article.  I will, however, be expanding on this post.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the Republican National Committee <a title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/us/politics/31repubs.html?hp" target="_blank">nominated</a> their first black chairman.  Being a republican, I&#8217;m excited by this, even though I don&#8217;t really pay attention to the going-ons of the national committee.  But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m excited for the right reason.</p>
<p>People have said that it&#8217;s historic that a black person can become president after decades of racism.  Overcoming all adversity, fulfilling Martin Luther King&#8217;s dream.  But what was his dream?</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>I believe that Obama was voted president not by the content of his character but the color of his skin.  And now, to avoid the label racism, the RNC is following suite.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s character has been questioned since his nomination.  His pastor, his relationship with a known and convicted terrorist, his lack of any credible leadership experience were completely ignored because of one reason: &#8220;change&#8221;  It didn&#8217;t matter to the American people what kind of change.  Obama could have been white and won the election.  But the fact that he is black gave America the opprotunity to forgive themselves of any racial prejustice they had.  The election was about change but race was what Obama ran on, whether he knew it or not.</p>
<p>The racism that is currently permiating America is very subtile.  People are so afraid of being called racist that they will do things they normally wouldn&#8217;t do so they can avoid being labeled one.  Consider the appointment of Roland Burris.  Before he was appointed, Obama and his fellow democrats announced that they would not honor any appointment by now impeached Rob <span id="intelliTXT">Blagojevich.  Obama was ademant that any appointment by </span><span id="intelliTXT">Blagojevich would be tainted.  His stance changed when Burris was appointed. </span><span id="intelliTXT">Blagojevich, counting on the fact that Burris is black, knew that the Senate would have to seat the only black senator.  If they didn&#8217;t, they would be labeled a bigot.  Obama suddently backs down and quietly tells the Senate to seat Burris, completely ignoring the fact that several days ago, he wouldn&#8217;t support any person appointed by </span><span id="intelliTXT">Blagojevich.</span></p>
<p><span>Racism comes in many forms.  Anything done to treat someone different because of the color of their skin is racism.  If a black person is denied access to a building because he&#8217;s black, that&#8217;s racism.  But if that same black person is encouraged and ushered into the building because he&#8217;s black, it&#8217;s still racism.</span></p>
<p><span>I couldn&#8217;t help but overhear one of my co-workers the day after the election.  He called several people and asked if they helped write history.  It&#8217;s sad because the only reason it was history was because Obama is black.  If he was white, would there have been the same pomp and circumstance?  If he was white, would there have been mad hocking of merchandise?  If he was white, would we even be having this conversation?</span></p>
<p><span>America, you are racist, even if you do it with a smile on your face.  Yes, let put black people in power to make yourselves look good.  Let&#8217;s completely ignore everything else because you want to save face.  You don&#8217;t want to be called racist, right?</span></p>
<p><span>I&#8217;d rather be labeled a racist and judge a man by his character than be labeled &#8220;open-minded&#8221; because I support Michael Steele.  Racism has turned from hatrid to undeserved respect.  As a real minority, I find it sickening.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><br />
</span></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikesoh.com/2009/01/racist-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
